Clock acceleration: Hall of Fame of everything

Pentium V @ 9333 MHz

An honest and sincere chronicle regarding technical simplicity and the true value—not only of the classics but of everything around us—which, on this global website, I call the "Hall of Fame of Everything": Protons, Electrons, and Neutrons..

9333.33
Reached 9.333 GHz without a warm-up ramp; progressive behavior.
-33°C
"Highball-sized" ice cubes, Great-great-grandfather's copper pot.
1.272V
Default voltage for the CPU (serial number ending in 33). General range: 1.2–1.3V.
30' aprox.
From ice extraction and PC rotational placement to validation.
Before introducing myself—for the benefit of anyone who might drop in and vanish—let me offer a single telling example (in addition to the one that took me so much effort to find):
the index of authority, not only of the creator in question but also of the established order of operations.

My story, my particularities with the 3 and the "record"

Origins and lineage

Origins and lineage: I come from a working-class family that is noble in essence. On my father's side, the family line descends from the Counts of Valencia de Alcántara (bearing the royal surname Cabrera); however, due to records from a bygone era—stemming from the fact that I am the son of the son of the illegitimate son of the Cabreras of Badajoz—I inherited the surname Barrada. On my mother's side, my grandparents hailed from Becerril de Campos (Martín and Ibáñez).

The marks of destiny

The marks of destiny and the number 3: My life has been marked by critical moments that seem to gravitate around patterns we recognize—or rather, label—as numerical. On December 12, 1993 (12/12/93), I suffered a severe accident that left me in a grade 2 out of 3 (or 4 out of 6) coma, from which I managed to recover.

Years later, an electric shock shot through my body when I brought a fork within about a centimeter of a wall socket; I was overcome by it, though luckily the circuit breaker tripped—this was back in the 90s. At another point, up on Montjuïc mountain with my first 50cc Derbi Senda, I bought pills from a dealer hoping to cross over to the other side, but I woke up shivering from the cold; I’d been sold a dud. I recall another instance—at night—when I saw myself rising from the bed; yet when I turned my gaze, I saw my own body lying there. I realized I was slipping away into the afterlife, but I didn't want to go. It took a tremendous effort; I begged God—or whoever was listening—saying (though I didn't have as much faith then as I do now) that I didn't want to leave, and I was allowed to return. It was unforgettable. From all those experiences—and others left untold—I retain a profound perspective on the value of life and our own being.

Life and technological journey

Life and technological journey: I grew up surrounded by significant numbers—such as living at 93 Numancia Street (7th floor, apartment 3, Staircase B) or, years later, managing the phone number 933333333, which was linked to my time as a taxi driver and the creator of the mercedes.barcelona dispatch service. My passion for computing began at age 9 with an Oric One, followed shortly by an IBM 386 with 16-color EGA graphics, a Master System, and various Pentium machines, eventually leading me to found my own programming and PC assembly company (Grupo ABM) between 2003 and 2009.

The story behind the record: This entire life journey—sincere and devoid of any desire for fame beyond the truth itself—is what drove me to tackle this technical milestone with the Pentium V at 9333 MHz. Achieving it wasn't just a matter of studying physical limits; I put the theory into practice—grappling with the highs and lows of existence—and managed to realize in just half an hour of work what I had been testing for three months. After more than 30 years in computing, the result reflects a passion for technology, the divine, and the hidden.

The story behind the record I will attempt to explain the rest of my story and characteristics ...such as my involvement in the worlds of music and film—and, on the fly: *ARRR* (that’s how I was taught back in 1999 at RACA 20, Castillejos II Brigade, serving as a First Corporal in the VM). I have owned two Ferraris, two Lamborghinis, and a pearl-white AMG GT S, yet I have also known poverty both before and after those cars. Thanks to a mix of luck and hard work, I have a roof over my head—one earned through my own projects and ingenuity.

The story behind the record, technical realities, and my specific circumstances

The background of the record

A note to the reader and the technical reality: Before understanding the significance of this record, we need to explain what is actually happening. The truth is—believe it or not—when most manufacturers market SSDs as "ultra-fast" (capable of 16 GBps or more), those figures are based on highly hypothetical, theoretical scenarios; while they can indeed be demonstrated using stress-testing tools, they do not reflect real-world performance.

One of my certifications—funny thing is, I earned this one on the 6th day of the 3rd month of the ninth new year.
I won't go into the details right now about why your SSD—advertised as capable of 3, 6, or 9 Gbps (being TLC)—actually drops to speeds below 600 MBps (or even under 300 MBps) once it exceeds 15% capacity. I am currently developing an analysis and testing program for that, utilizing low-level instruction calls; the program's name will eventually become the title of the web domain where I write, but that is a story for another time. I mention this so that you—the reader (I’m not sure how to address you, so I’ll aim for a general profile)—understand that the truth exists, but you have to know how to look for it, as every side tries to convince you to join them.

One of my certifications—funny thing is, I earned this one on the 6th day of the 3rd month of the ninth new year. I remember coding raw HTML back in 1999 at the Bit academy near Plaça de Tetuan in Barcelona. Also the MCSE and MCTS from Microsoft.





Obstacles with benchmark platforms: Popular benchmarking sites like HWBot and CPU-Z face two issues when it comes to setting records with legacy hardware.

While the former increasingly demands a more modern version of the CPU-Z tool (year after year)—as seen at the link hwbot.org/benchmarks/cpu_frequency/submissions/5523731, where someone clocked the same CPU model I used at approximately 8.5 GHz in 2024 (when version v2.X was permitted), whereas in the current year, 2026, the minimum required version is 2.Y.



CPU-Z on Windows 99 does not validate CPUs released after 2004
On another note, the only version of CPU-Z compatible with Windows 9X operating systems (the environment where I achieved the 9333 MHz) is v1.03 (Vintage). However, when I run it and attempt to validate, a message appears stating that the processor is too modern for that version—go figure! Of course, that makes sense; since it was developed for Windows 9X (95-98-99)—an era predating Windows XP, whose drivers are completely incompatible with the XP+ architecture (based on Windows 2000/2003) versus the 9X line (based on Windows NT)—it is somewhat to be expected, but that is simply the situation. I cannot install a different version. The HWBot website mentions that, among their three validation methods, there is a manual option; however, the very next sentence in the same paragraph notes that the manual process has become more complicated, and it concludes by stating that version 2.1X or higher is required. I wrote to one of the moderators in July regarding a test with a different processor—a Pentium IV—attempting to hit 7 GHz, but I received no reply. I also contacted CPU-Z directly, but likewise received no response.

The Mirage of Destiny

The mirage of commercial validation tools: Why does this often happen? I wonder—and perhaps I am mistaken in my logical deduction—but regarding hard drives, CrystalDiskMark was once a very popular tool back when measurements were "pure"—meaning Q1T1 (queue depth 1, threads 1). However, for years now, it has measured QxTy (where x and y are 32 or similar); the point is that, in practice, the average user never actually reaches those speeds. That is not to mention OS-level tricks—such as the caching Windows 10+ performs using your PC's RAM buffer—or the DRAM found in commercial SSDs, or the so-called "pseudo-SLC cache." This cache is simply a portion of TLC memory emulated as SLC (Single-Level Cell) to make the drive run incredibly fast; however, once you exceed 5% capacity, the speed drops drastically, and past 15% it becomes minimal—sometimes under 100 MB/s. I know this firsthand because, when I created the Fran8K camera, I realized while recording image sequences (frames) that once a certain data volume was reached, you had two choices: use SLC drives or resort to real-time RAW compression—like RED does with its R3D codec, or Sony with its own, and so on. Incidentally, RED's codec technology was recently freed from patent restrictions by a Japanese court ruling, to the detriment of its new owner, Nikon.

Conclusion and Perspective: As the founder and creator of the Cinemartin Cinec encoders, I was in contact with RED's president and CEO, Jim Jannard and Jarred Land (see video dedicated to RED and its Ranger S35 8K). I also recently discovered that the Sony CineAlta F65 is the best camera—on par with the F35 but with higher resolution. Anyway, forgive me, dear reader; these are very technical matters. I’m just leaving you a link so you can see how the Sony delivers 17 stops of dynamic range versus the 14 Sony claimed at the time (well, they said "14+" because they couldn't prove anything beyond 14...). In short: the so-called "world we live in"—which I prefer to call "the Earth we live in," as we know nothing of what lies beyond—is increasingly capitalist and imposes its own rules. Through this piece, I aim to help you understand it, or at least—regarding those who wish to follow me versus those who don't—to adopt the attitude my Spanish Language teacher, Father Arlegui (who is still alive and whom I visit occasionally), once described: build a "silver bridge" for them to leave.

To top it all off, even when I try to submit a verified link from another record I hold to HWBot—filling in all the manual fields to get the info across—it simply doesn't work. It seems they have everything fully automated. They simply extract the data shown in CPU-Z, which is a terrible approach. I don't consider HWBOT professional; I understand they take money from sponsors and skip manual verifications because they're rolling in cash, BUT YOU HAVE TO BE PROFESSIONAL. If the manual submission feature doesn't work, disable it—don't waste users' time having them fill it out only to show a screenshot later. Anyway...

Screenshot taken on August 31, 2026, at 00:50 (Peninsular time); source: hwbot.org.

Record testing, validation, and verification

Regarding the verification of the 9.333 GHz: I can prove the 9.333 GHz I achieved with videos and photos; I cannot prove anything else. Perhaps reading this text will help you understand—depending on your profile, whether you are technically inclined or not, or a professional in the field... well, without wishing to offend anyone, everyone is free to believe what they wish and, of course, to express their opinion.

Record details and authenticity: I have attached a screenshot of the record in BMP 1920 x 1200 RAW 24-bit format. From this, one can locally read the file's creation date to prove it hasn't been modified—though I must note that dates *can* be altered using a binary editor. I say this without intending to offend the experts who request screenshots as proof; the truth is, however, that the only way to truly authenticate that a file hasn't been tampered with is by checking the inaccessible partitions of the OS hard drive—specifically the registry partition, not the MBR. But anyway, moving on.

Available audiovisual material: Here is the video (a medium-length version, so as not to be tedious) of the moment I recorded the scene. I used both a mobile camera (you can watch the YouTube video below, or click here for the full version) and an 8K camera; I have included the latter as an additional option at the end of this document:

Why all computing is based on the Architect's number

I am not a Freemason, but I believe in the number 3. Good things come in threes. Born in Barcelona—area code 93. My WhatsApp number (inherited from the Taxi Mercedes dispatch service I used to manage) is 933333333. The accident that left me clinically dead for just over a week happened on December 12, 1993—I don't know... there are so many coincidences: the 33 victories Fernando Alonso is chasing, the 3 songs I composed for him (the last one is titled Circuitos de Ajedrez / Chess Circuits).

.
The Significance of the Number 3 (YouTube comment)

I increasingly believe in matters "from the beyond"—aspects inaccessible to ordinary mortals. I am mortal like everyone else, but I have certain connections—call it lived experience, or perhaps the work of consciousness. Yet there are moments when that isn't the case; moments when I connect with the Lord of All. I recall one time, a few weeks ago, when I asked Him: "How can I know it's You and not my own consciousness? You have to understand," I said. He replied, "Do you see my tone and way of speaking as the same as the voice that is with you?" And everything clicked. At that moment, He told me—He indicated: "Carry on." And that is what I do day after day, following the path I believe is right. I might be wrong, but I am doing so with what I consider to be a record. Some—quite a few, actually—argue that it isn't valid unless verified by HWBot (which is essentially the same group behind CPU-Z). However, as I’ve explained before, it cannot be validated by either HWBot or CPU-Z; yet, based on the evidence provided, I can state that it *is* valid—I have achieved it. I am simply documenting this here on this web portal, which will host a suite of analysis and testing tools for storage drives. This is part of an architecture I am developing for three areas: the aforementioned storage, central processing units (CPUs), and a third component focused on imaging—covering not just GPUs, but also analysis, video certification, dynamic range, and so on.

Why the classics are the most valuable

This demonstrates that what is labeled "complex" or "obsolete"—depending on who is doing the labeling—often masks commercial interests; meanwhile, elements from the past are far simpler, more transparent, and superior to what is sold to us today.
For instance, the power supply used is a "Made in USA" PC Power and Cooling unit—none of that "Made in China" stuff. It is the first version of the 750W Silencer, which delivered all its power via a single 12V rail. I won't go into technical details, but nothing available today matches it.

The heatsink is a limited edition of just 1,000 units manufactured by Thermalright (the American company, not the Asian Thermaltake). Back then, copper was—let's say—affordable enough to use for manufacturing, albeit in limited runs. The heatsink I used weighs 2 kg and is made of pure copper; it’s not the "stylish copper" finish some brands sell; You always have to check the manufacturer's website or documentation. Many YouTubers say "copper," but fail to realize that the parts are—let's say—plated or painted to look like copper. The heatsink I use is the "1000" model; it differs from the next one up (the "3000") by having six tracks—or fins, if you will—with three on each side to progressively conduct heat away (whereas the "3000" unit had four fins).

Of course, the CPU has to be the 631, specifically the latest variant—the D0—which had a thermal design power (at medium load) of 65W (TDP = 65), matching the 65-nanometer manufacturing process. They were going to be called Pentium V; in fact, motherboard manufacturers used to label boards that supported these 65nm Pentiums (as opposed to the 90nm and 130nm versions) as "P5"—take the Asus P5E, for example...



You know Intel loves the number 3, and that the base bus speed for every CPU is actually 99.9999 MHz—which they simply call 100 MHz. You know that the "Quad-pumped" bus still used today—the one they claimed ran at 800 MHz (FSB)—is actually just 100 MHz? How? You might say I'm lying, but no—let me explain: each of the four memory slots on Pentium IV or V chips (non-server types) receives data requests from the CPU at 100 MHz and outputs data at that same 100 MHz. However, they took the 100 MHz input and the 100 MHz output and marketed it as 200 MHz; multiply that by four, and you get 800 MHz. But really, it’s all based on a repeating decimal (like 33.33...), just like the 33 MHz PCI bus...

As a side note, the unique serial number of the CPU I used to achieve that magic figure is 5646B84, and if you add up all the digits, you get 33.


It’s like other things—take a standard gasoline car, for instance: no turbo, no hybrid system, nothing extra. It’s purer and less prone to failure than the same model equipped with all the bells and whistles they add these days—supposedly (a cheap excuse) to cut down on pollution. Then the WHO—an organization bought and corrupted by governments and multinationals—comes along and tells you to get vaccinated with products made by some affiliated third-party company, while the media warns: "Watch out, you could kick the bucket." Sure, we all could—and eventually we all will—but they bombard you with news about everyone dying, so you go and get the shot, bleating "Baaaa" just like a sheep. Sorry, that’s just how I see things—everyone has their own opinion—but as long as you aren't disrespectful or forcing someone to act against their conscience, everyone is free to speak their mind.
It’s the same story with headphones, for example: nothing beats plugging in a cable, yet for years now they’ve been pushing Bluetooth ones on us—which come with all sorts of pairing issues and the like. It’s just like phones: sure, there’s Android and iPhone, but you’re practically forced by Google and Apple to unlock them with a password, then tap here, punch in numbers, make sure your fingers aren't wet, and so on... well, you get the idea. Compare that to the sheer practicality of pulling out one of those old-school Nokia or Alcatel phones with physical buttons and just making a call—simple as that. Simplicity is far better and more practical than complexity.

I’m including a gallery of images showing the components I used and highlighting specific details—like the Patriot memory modules with copper filaments in their heat spreaders. Nowadays, manufacturers use aluminum because it’s cheaper, but copper offers two to four times better thermal conductivity than aluminum. Still, that’s just the reality of the market these days:



Used equipment

Detailed detail of the test bench, in English the "setup".

  • CPU: Intel Pentium 4 631, Stepping D0, 65nm, TDP 65W, serial number 5646B84.
  • Sink: Thermalright (1 of 1000), 2 Kg pure copper heatsink with 6 heatpipes.
  • Motherboard: Asus Maximus Extreme, 1st series.
  • Power Supply: PC Cooler Silencer 750W (1 12V lane).
  • RAM Memory: DDR3 (from G.Skill to Patriot USA MADE LLK).
  • GPU: 3DFX Voodoo 5500 PCI, which were later succumbed by those in Marketing, and after its purchase by the now tinged with false AI, NVIDIA.
  • Storage: Intel X25-E 32GB SLC SSD; I actually have another one—an E1 engineering sample with the wrong label.
  • Operating System and Software: Windows 99 with CPU-Z 1.03 (Vintage).


  • OTHER: Sony SDM-P232W monitor. Manufactured in late 2002, released to the public in 2003. The "23" denotes the size in inches, the "P" indicates it is the successor to the famous PVM series, and the final "2" indicates the year. It has a maximum resolution of 1920x1200, transmitted via analog connection from the XGA D-Sub 15 output of the 3dfx Voodoo5 5500 PCI card (since the AGP version caused many issues).


Some details:
The motherboard must feature a PCI bus—specifically version 2.2. I am not referring to PCIe here; the PCI-Express bus frequency cannot be pushed beyond a 5% increase (from 100 to 105 MHz) because it is essentially a derivative of PCI—though these are technical details that might be too complex even for somewhat advanced users.
Version 2.3 boards only supplied 3.3V, whereas version 2.2 boards retained the classic "legacy" mode supporting up to 5V. This is crucial when overclocking a CPU—specifically Pentium 4 chips linked to Northbridge and Southbridge controllers—because you absolutely must avoid altering the voltage. Raising the voltage creates a steep spike; it is like delivering a massive punch to someone—an action that requires liquid nitrogen to handle. Conversely, if you leave the voltage alone, it is like having many tiny helpers share the same cake—or many people striking with less force but the same total impact. This results in gradual heat generation (conductivity), eliminating the need for LN2.
Sorry for the long-winded explanation; the PCI-based 3dfx card handles frequency increases without issue, provided you have that 5V supply via a motherboard using the ICH9R (not ICH10R) Southbridge and/or the X38 (not X48) chipset.
I will provide further details in another section below. For me, using the graphics card with that specific monitor is pure gold. It is like the Sony Tektronix 335 analyzer I used, which gave me a bird's-eye view of the voltage; it may not be precision-accurate, but it provides an insight that the motherboard itself cannot offer. Why? ...because the motherboard provides sensor data once you're in the BIOS, but the issue is the boot-up process—determining whether it actually boots or not—and that requires a pre-BIOS tool. With the oscilloscope, you measure voltage (in the case of the 335 model), and for frequency, you hook up a BNC cable (the kind used for TVs, yes) to measure the waves/frequencies. It’s a bit complex to explain, but... anyway... here are the images.

All the photos and the text are my own work—no "YAYA" (Catalan for "grandma") involved. Below is a video montage I put together; it's part of a project that might become a short film or a feature—we'll see...

The months of prior testing with other components

It took about three months. That doesn't mean I learned everything in three months; experience counts for a lot.
The patient work of trial and error—discarding dead ends and understanding how the silicon responds before reaching the final result—involves steps such as (to cite a few examples):
* Experimenting with modifying socket pins; experts know that some socket pins are redundant—included in case a specific pin fails to carry enough voltage—so you can "trick" the motherboard into drawing more voltage through the other pins. These are just practices that, in my case, resulted in rendering one of the two Asus Maximus Extreme boards I own useless (incidentally, the first ROG series—the ones measuring 30 cm on one side instead of 27).

* Testing other boards like the P5Q, Gigabyte UD3P, and UD3R; the "R" model is better because it has only one PCIe slot, meaning the CPU doesn't have to take as many "detours" when sending and receiving data via PCIe. Gigabyte boards are necessary for determining the voltage used by the CPU; as some may know, voltage varies depending on—let's say—the quality of the CPU when it left the factory. This is still relevant today, which is why manufacturers specify a range (e.g., 1.2 to 1.33 V for the P631 boards I've used). The downside of ASUS boards is that they don't display the actual voltage; they only offer an "AUTO" option or manual setting, whereas Gigabyte boards (which I consider superior) show the real-time voltage. That’s why I noted down the necessary voltage in a notebook for my calculations. In the end, I used the Asus board—having gone through so many motherboards and CPUs (like the highly coveted P571, for instance)—but the important thing was having the data recorded.
* Testing by slightly "burning in" certain areas of the CPU. Yes, you heard that right; look it up online for more info. It’s an old-school technique that essentially tricks the CPU into thinking it's running hotter than it is. But practically speaking, the specific BIOS adjustments required are as follows:


BIOS
Set everything to disabled: all peripherals = OFF (disabled), hard drive error correction = OFF, everything in legacy mode, IDE, USB = off, etc., etc. I’m not going to explain all the presets and my specific settings here either, because—as you’ll understand—that falls under what I call a "sealed secret," though I have dropped a few hints.

"The Process" in half an hour: the divine number

Perhaps it was the invocation—on one hand of the "master" and on the other of its reverse order—that marked the key moment when everything fell into place during just thirty minutes of perfect synchronization.

I’ll summarize—to keep it brief—what I emailed to the CPU-Z developer under the subject line "PROCEDURE" (a message to which I have yet to receive a reply).


A copper pot from the 50s (belonging to my great-great-great-grandfather) full of ice, fresh out of the refrigerator
Set it up as described above, rotated 180 degrees, with only the Thermalright cooler inside the pot. Let it for a few minutes, with the computer turned off, no signal power.
Then power on, wait until windows 99 boot, it automatically load cpuz, then take screenshot (ImpPan/PetSis, print screen key) then paste on Paint and save, close paint.


All test material made available

Resources, data, and references provided so that anyone interested can study, verify, or replicate the experiment with complete transparency and simplicity.

I permit the distribution of the images and text from this blog, provided that authorship is acknowledged:





In Lloret de Mar, at 03:41 on September 1st, in the year of our Lord 2026,
Alejandro Barrada/Cabrera Martín Orellana Ibáñez, just as a person used to be identified


PS: I have some connection to the beyond—or so I think; I could be wrong—but I asked for possession, saying—not to take it seriously—that I just wanted a bit of both sides, because that is how I believe the earth is divided, like a coin; and as for who's in charge, well, sometimes one, sometimes the other, like in ...nature. It was likely the King of Kings—or the All—who tipped the scales, sometimes one way and sometimes the other. Perhaps I am mistaken.